If I am to be judged based on my individual performance? Let it be for my contribution as a teammate. Why would that be the case? That's an individual metric. One player (rudely) implied that the main factor is damage. You should gain extra points from difficult matches. You shouldn't lose extra points from battles in which you were the underdog. Can you guess which two players dominated, and which four were dead weight? The 4000-ranked players they threw to each side didn't help. One match we had two guys that had less than 50% wins, really low average damage, and were rated around 1500. Some of my teammates have been exceptionally poor. I've lost almost every match since my placement. Outrageous! It's completely unfair.Įven if I manage to get 50% wins? I'll still be losing points! And I'm not even doing that well.
I've been losing a steady 25-41 points on every loss. (While the rest of us are slowly surrounded and massacred.) Usually in favor of chasing down one weak enemy. (As all the action was occurring outside their line-of-sight.) Multiple allies would take up camping/sniper positions.In response, they attempted to hide and run out the clock. At least one ally would see things going poorly.Allies separated and went all over the map.In terms of better teammates and combined average rating. Enemy team had a significant advantage.Forced to make a sacrifice to protect against a flanking manoeuver.With both having roughly the same quality of teammate and combined average rating.
(I'd provide more info, and possibly screenshots. It's probably best to divide this between how my wins and losses went. But, whatever, right? I'll just earn my way up. Really? 2800? Me? I'm at least as good as a 3200 player. Last night I finally got the chance to try them out. Unfortunately, I'm usually asleep/busy during the times they are "open".
For some time, I've wanted to try the rated matches.
0 kommentar(er)
